The American adventure in space is at a crossroads. During a generation of unprecedented exploration, we sent humans to the moon, peered into deepest space to understand the dawn of the Universe, discovered new planets orbiting other stars, and sought abodes for life in our Solar System. But now the shuttering of the Space Shuttle program, the cost growth of space missions, and the squeeze on federal spending place NASA in peril. What do these developments mean for our future in the final frontier... and our own home? Will the US continue to lead the world in space? Should it?

What we now refer to as "development" really began in a systematic way after World War II. The victors had a variety of pressures to address, the most fearsome being the threat of yet another emerging conflict involving new applications of science and technology and even more deadly weaponry. Moreover, the relationship between the economic and social devastation of World War I and the rise of a fanatical régime in Germany was regarded as self-evident.

New America Foundation President Steve Coll and Nicholas Thompson, Future Tense fellow and Editor of NewYorker.com, discuss Coll's book "Private Empire: ExxonMobil and American Power" at New America's annual Board of Directors' retreat at the Newseum in Washington, DC on April 27, 2012.
In his latest book, Present Shock: When Everything Happens Now, leading media theorist Douglas Rushkoff argues that the dissonance between our digital selves and our analog bodies has thrown us into a new state of anxiety. He examines what it means to be human in an always-connected reality-how modern events and trends have affected our biology, behavior, politics, and culture.
Cars and coal may get most of the attention, but one of the biggest contributors to climate change is the food industry. Globally, agriculture accounts for at least 25 percent of humanity's annual greenhouse gas emissions, according to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization. But some think that this situation could be radically changed-instead of just cutting agriculture's carbon footprint, maybe we can use agriculture to reverse climate change. By harnessing photosynthesis' power, experts think we can turn a major part of the problem into a solution.
Filmmaker Peter Byck and leading Grass Fed Beef rancher/scientist Allen Williams presented a new 12 minute film, "Soil Carbon Cowboys." Byck and Allen will then discuss the ASU*SoilCarbon Nation's regenerative grazing research plans to measure potential benefits: carbon sequestration, animal health, water infiltration & retention, methane & nitrous oxide emissions, insect, wildlife, fungi & bacteria populations and rancher well-being.
A decade ago, Russell Gold noticed something going on in Fort Worth, Texas-oil drillers were suddenly afire with talk of a strange new phenomenon. Employing a new method that seemed a lot more like mining than drilling, they were improbably extracting natural gas from rock that had confounded everyone for decades-almost imporous shale. Since then, Gold-a senior energy correspondent for The Wall Street Journal -has roamed the country investigating the boom created by the Fort Worth discovery.
It's an issue that has been repeated in countless reports and news stories: the United States is facing a looming shortage of scientists, technologists, engineers, and mathematicians-a STEM crisis, that is. The President has repeatedly stated that over the next decade, 1 million new STEM graduates will be needed. And to make up the difference until then, tech companies like Facebook, IBM, and Microsoft are lobbying to boost the number of H-1B visas-temporary immigration permits for skilled workers-from 65,000 per year to as many as 180,000.
President Eisenhower's address is mainly remembered for his warning of the perils of a "military-industrial complex." Less widely known, but no less important was his caution, a few sentences later, about "the danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." This seminar explored the historical context and current relevance of Eisenhower's worries about a "scientific-technological elite." CSPO faculty members and authors Dan Sarewitz and G. Pascal Zachary spoke, along with author and journalist Daniel S.
What percentage of scientists believe that climate change is occurring mostly because of human activity? What percentage of the US public believe otherwise? How do we bridge the gaps between experts, citizens and policymakers? How do we engage the disengaged and uninformed public? Against this backdrop, we discuss World Wide Views on Climate and Energy (WWViews C&E), a global citizen consultation. On June 6, 2015, about 100 citizens representing the demographic diversity of the host countries will attend daylong meetings at sites around the world.
Subscribe to Science Policy